Skip to main content
· 9/28/1920

Farden v. Richardson

Citations

  • 25 Haw. 611
  • 1920 Haw. LEXIS 17

Syllabus

<p>Parties — plaintiffs must have and show interest in controversy.</p> <p>It is elementary that a person appearing as plaintiff must have and show an existing remedial interest in the cause of action.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating subparagraphs (2) and (3) of 38 C.F.R. § 3.812(f) (1991) as “in excess of statutory authority”
  • “strong presumption that plain language of a statute expresses congressional intent is rebutted only in rare and exceptional circumstances”
  • regulations in excess of statutory authority are void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Banks, Coke, Edings, Kemp, Place

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.