Farberware, Inc. v. Mr. Coffee, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Today, however, trade dress can also refer to the appearance of the product itself.”
• “Although the fact that Mr. Coffee’s product is meant to appeal to modest consumers, while Far-berware’s is directed to the more upscale, does not negate that these products compete, it does lead the Court to consider another relevant factor, namely the price differential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).