Skip to main content
· 6/29/1983

Farber v. Howell

Citations

  • 665 P.2d 1067
  • 105 Idaho 57
  • 1983 Ida. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a default judgment entered without three day’s notice is voidable
  • rejecting the argument that appellants were relieved of their responsibility to amend the pleading when the amendment went only to formal or immaterial matters and noting that I.R.C.P. 15(a) clearly requires a party to plead in response to an amended pleading
  • rejecting the argument that appellants were relieved of their responsibility to amend the pleading when the amendment went only to formal or immaterial matters and noting that I.R.C.P. 15(a) clearly requires a party to plead in response to an amended pleading
  • “In the instant case the order did not contain the words, ‘without further notice.’ Therefore, any default entered without three day’s [sic] notice is voidable.”
  • defendants had a responsibility to respond to the amended pleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Donaldson, Bakes, Huntley, Scoggin, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.