New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/1/1955
Fantony v. Fantony
Citations
- 115 A.2d 610
- 36 N.J. Super. 375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in in rem action, court first acquiring jurisdiction will retain it regardless of subsequent action by different court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knight
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Casteel v. CasteelNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1957-06-07· cited 29×
- DiBiano v. DiBianoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1969-05-05· cited 7×
- State v. HolmesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-02-11· cited 5×
- Olsen v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-03-27· cited 4×
- Havice v. HaviceSnyder County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-01-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- May v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1953-05-18· cited 674×
- New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court· 1947-03-31· cited 419×
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-10-27· cited 11×
- Simoni v. D'IppolitoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-12-10· cited 6×
- Fantony v. FantonyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-05-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.