Fantasy Ranch v. City of Arlington TX, et a

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the City of Arlington’s summary judgment evidence included a report by the City’s expert, several studies concerning secondary effects, and data cited in numerous opinions
• noting that city relied on studies and numerous court opinions “all of which demonstrate a connection between dancer-patron touching and unsavory secondary effects”
• explaining that although live erotic entertainment is protected by First Amendment, governments can regulate it
• explaining that although live erotic entertainment is protected by First Amendment, governments can regulate it
• stating that governments may justify enactment of regulation with evidence presented at trial
• stating that governments may justify enactment of regulation with evidence presented at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).