Fant v. New England Power Service Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “questions relating to qualifications and seniority usually require recourse to details that are imbedded in CBAs”
• noting that section 75B(3) provides that “[i]n the event that any right set forth in this section is inconsistent with an applicable collective bargaining agreement, such agreement shall prevail”
• affirming district court decision that state -6- law claim for failure to recall was preempted by the LMRA because it was based on seniority provisions of the CBA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).