Fannon v. Polo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a court is not required to consider an issue raised for the first time in the context of a motion for (continued...
• “The interpretation of a covenant is a question of law to which we apply our independent judgment.” (quoting HP Ltd. P’ship v. Kenai River Airpark, LLC, 270 P.3d 719, 726 (Alaska 2012))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Norman Randle v. Bay Watch Condominium Association
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2021-06-18· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New York
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 107×
• Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-10-10· cited 92×
• Harvey v. Cook
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2007-12-21· cited 35×
• Engstrom v. Engstrom
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-05-15· cited 34×
• Kelly v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-03-02· cited 31×
• Hagen v. Strobel
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-07-10· cited 30×
• HP Ltd. Partnership v. Kenai River Airpark, LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-01-13· cited 15×
• McCarter v. McCarter
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-07-05· cited 13×
• Hurst v. Victoria Park Subdivision Addition No. 1 Homeowners' Ass'n
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2002-11-29· cited 3×