Fanning v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \brief delays in receipt do not rise to level of a materially adverse action\
• explaining that to satisfy the exhaustion requirement, a civil claim must “grow out of or [be] like or reasonably related to” the allegations in the administrative charge
• stating Rule 15(b)(2) “provides for an issue not raised in the pleadings to be tried by the parties' express or implied consent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).