Skip to main content
· 8/17/1995

Fandrich v. Capital Ford Lincoln Mercury

Citations

  • 901 P.2d 112
  • 272 Mont. 425
  • 52 State Rptr. 806
  • 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 194
  • 1995 Mont. LEXIS 180
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,671

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing “agent” in the state nondiscrimination statute’s definition of “employer” in “the ordinary meaning of the word ‘agent,’ ” and thus holding that the term “includes employees who are subject to an employer’s control while performing their job duties”
  • this case does not address the issue in the same manner that it is addressed here, but the reasoning indicates that employees are subject to individual liability
  • where the plaintiff was “barred from bringing his claim pursuant to the Montana Wrongful Discharge From Employment Act because the Human Rights Act provide[d] his exclusive remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trieweiler, Turnage, Gray, Hunt, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.