· 8/17/1995
Fandrich v. Capital Ford Lincoln Mercury
Citations
- 901 P.2d 112
- 272 Mont. 425
- 52 State Rptr. 806
- 11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 194
- 1995 Mont. LEXIS 180
- 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing “agent” in the state nondiscrimination statute’s definition of “employer” in “the ordinary meaning of the word ‘agent,’ ” and thus holding that the term “includes employees who are subject to an employer’s control while performing their job duties”
- this case does not address the issue in the same manner that it is addressed here, but the reasoning indicates that employees are subject to individual liability
- where the plaintiff was “barred from bringing his claim pursuant to the Montana Wrongful Discharge From Employment Act because the Human Rights Act provide[d] his exclusive remedy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trieweiler, Turnage, Gray, Hunt, Weber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.