Fancher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s presence at scene of accident and ownership of vehicle were sufficient to corroborate extrajudicial confession
• holding that defendant’s presence at scene of accident and ownership of vehicle were sufficient to corroborate extrajudicial confession
• defendant's extrajudicial confession was sufficiently corroborated under the facts of the case by his presence at the scene and evidence that he was the owner of the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dinnery v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-23· cited 416×
• Alvarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-02-05· cited 24×
• Franco v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-06-08· cited 19×
• McClane v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-06-15· cited 17×
• Michael Channing McCann v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-03-25· cited 14×
• Castillo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-10-31· cited 8×
• Harp v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-10-21· cited 5×
• Nelson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-03· cited 4×
• De La Garza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-05-20· cited 3×
• Craig Alan Nieschwietz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-06-21
• Emily Jean Grahn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-08-31
• Jose Benjamin Ortiz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2004-05-13
• George Larry Harvey v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2011-08-29

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Threet v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1952-06-25· cited 58×