Famology. Com Inc. v. Perot Systems Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conversion action could not be brought under Pennsylvania law for misappropriation of internet domain names because such domain names do not constitute tangible property
• stating that a domain name is a type of tangible property
• “Plaintiff has failed to point the court to a single case in which an American court has used trademark misuse affirmatively.”
• rejecting claim for conversion of internet domain names

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).