Falls City Industries, Inc. v. Vanco Beverage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that findings based on “direct evidence of diverted sales” “more than established the competitive injury required for a prima facie case under section 2(a)”
• holding that evidence that defendant's price discrimination forced plaintiff to charge higher retail prices for beer and suffered lost sales as a result was sufficient to establish injury
• holding that evidence that defendant's price discrimination forced plaintiff to charge higher retail prices for beer and suffered lost sales as a result was sufficient to establish injury
• holding that there was competition between wholesale distributors of beer who sold exclusively in Indiana and Kentucky
• ruling that __________ findings based on \direct evidence of diverted sales\ \more than established the competitive injury required for a prima facie case under section 2(a)\
• stating that the section 2(b) inquiry “is guided by the standard of the prudent businessman responding fairly to what he reasonably believes are the competitive necessities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).