Skip to main content
· 8/9/1842

Falls Bridge Turnpike Co. v. Adams

Citations

  • 8 F. Cas. 980
  • 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 95
  • 1842 U.S. App. LEXIS 567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pretrial confinement credit questions not knowingly waived at trial should be resolved at the appellate level on the basis of plain error
  • holding that pretrial confinement credit questions not knowingly waived at trial should be resolved at the appellate level on the basis of plain error
  • failure to object to conditions of pretrial confinement is strong evidence of a lack of an Article 13, UCMJ, violation
  • failure to object to pretrial punishment prior to trial does not amount to waiver
  • fully developed on-the-record waiver of illegal-punishment issue required
  • de novo review of punitive-intent question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.