Falk v. Amsberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tenants held entitled to growing crop, after landlord sold the property, under both the common law of emblements and an Oregon statute
• tenants held entitled to growing crop, after landlord sold the property, under both the common law of emblements and an Oregon statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Falk v. Amsberry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-04-07· cited 57×
• Gerald P. And Patricia Andersen v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-05· cited 12×
• Falk v. Amsberry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-08-31· cited 6×
• Scott v. Hyde
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 6×
• Gallager v. Nelson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-18· cited 6×
• Leigh v. Lynch
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-05-21· cited 4×
• Fruin v. Gorden (In Re Gorden)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1985-03-08· cited 3×
• Falk v. Amsberry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-06-09· cited 3×
• Taggart v. Battaglia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 1×
• Burnam v. Garon Development Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-11-07· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sievers v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1899-02-27· cited 34×
• Myer v. Roberts
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1907-05-14· cited 13×
• Hostetler v. Eccles
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-11-18· cited 12×
• Key v. Loder
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-06-14· cited 2×