Falica v. ADVANCE TENANT SERVICES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a Court must adjust the requested rate “upward or downward to arrive at a final fee award that reflects the characteristics of the particular case (and counsel) for which the award is sought”
• noting that the Hensley analysis applies in FLSA cases
• declining to exclude fees spent on unsuccessful summary judgment motion when the motion was “integrally related to the theory upon which the plaintiffs ultimately prevailed”
• noting that Hensley analysis applies in FLSA cases
• “Using [the Laffey ] matrix as a guide, the Court must then exercise its discretion to adjust this sum upward or downward to arrive at a final fee award that reflects ‘the characteristics of the particular case (and counsel) for which the award is sought.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).