Fales v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute requiring that malpractice plaintiff \file with the complaint an affidavit of an expert\ did not permit later-filed amendment to supply missing affidavit because \[a] contrary holding would impermissibly gut the contemporaneous filing requirement\
• holding that statute requiring that malpractice plaintiff “file with the complaint an affidavit of an expert” did not permit later-filed amendment to supply missing affidavit because “[a] contrary holding would impermissibly gut the contemporaneous filing requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).