Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due diligence review is not “conducted on a de novo basis” but rather is a “question of fact,” which can only be set aside if it is “clearly erroneous”
• noting that the lack of incentive can be because of “bankruptcy or otherwise”
• insurer-garnishee found not liable to plaintiff on insurance policy entitled to attorneys’ fees under garnishee fee statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).