Falco v. Nissan North America Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was “no practical difference between live testimony and 28 contemporaneous video transmission”
• noting that “there is no practical difference between live testimony and 26 contemporaneous video transmission”
• noting that “there is no practical difference between live testimony and contemporaneous video transmission”
• noting lack of prejudice to non-movant 19 resulting from live video testimony
• Oklahoma-based witness permitted to testify by videoconferencing for hearing in Washington, D.C.
• witness in Oklahoma and trial in Washington, D.C.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).