Skip to main content
· 10/24/2002

Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of Vicksburg

Citations

  • 836 So. 2d 711
  • 2002 WL 31391609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is “one of those cases where a party with standing challenges board action on grounds it is ultra vires and where that party is entitled to proceed de novo ....”
  • stating that it is \ one of those cases where a party with standing challenges board action on grounds it is ultra vires and where that party is entitled to proceed de novo ....\
  • stating that it is “one of those cases where a party with standing challenges board action on grounds it is ultra vires and where that party is entitled to proceed de novo . . . .”
  • “[b]ecause Falco was required to proceed under Section 11-51-75, the circuit court was required to function in its appellate role and no discovery or testimony outside the bill of exceptions should have been allowed on the Board’s decision to close VKS.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.