Fajardo Sugar Growers Ass'n v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining how constructive discharge, like respondeat superior, is not a standalone claim 33 but a doctrine that satisfies an element of another substantive claim
• likening constructive discharge to respondeat superior, because neither is a standalone claim
• “For a charge or complaint to be timely, plaintiffs must file it ‘within 6 months after the date on which the alleged discriminatory act occurred.’” (quoting MD. CODE ANN., STATE GOV’T § 20-1004(c))
• “[C]onstructive discharge is not a standalone ‘claim.’”
• “[C]onstructive discharge is not a standalone ‘claim.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).