Faison v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where provision of one statute mirrors provisions of others they are generally “interpreted the same way by courts”
• “[A] plaintiff may not rely on the continuing violation theory where she was aware of the discriminatory conduct at the time it occurred.”
• first quoting Brady v. Off. of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 495 (D.C. Cir. 2008); then citing Aka v. Wash. Hosp. Ctr., 156 F.3d 1284, 1289 (D.C. Cir. 1998); Adeyemi v. District of Columbia, 525 F.3d 1222, 1227 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).