Fairmount Park, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that complaint adequately alleged that individual defendant who “knew of the allegedly unlawful procedures being used but nevertheless approved or ratified them” was a debt collector under the FDCPA
• finding that complaint adequately alleged that individual defendant who “knew of the allegedly unlawful procedures being used but nevertheless approved or ratified them” was a debt collector under the FDCPA
• denying motion to dismiss claims against “a stockholder and top executive” of a collection company where the plaintiff alleged “that he is personally liable as a debt collector because he knew of the allegedly unlawful procedures being used but nevertheless approved or ratified them”
• defendant knew of and ratified allegedly unlawful practices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).