Fairless v. Acuity
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 10
Syllabus
CONTRACTS—INSURANCE—DUTY TO DEFEND—ATTORNEY FEES: The trial court did not err in determining that defendant insurer had a duty to defend the underlying action where the claims in the underlying complaint were arguably within the policy coverage. The trial court did not err in declining to award plaintiffs attorney fees where the suit was between the insurer and the insured and no determination had been made that the insurer acted in bad faith in refusing to defend the insured in the underlying action.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.