Skip to main content
VACTAPP· 6/16/1998

Fairfax County School Board v. Rose

Citations

  • 27 Va. App. 587
  • 500 S.E.2d 273
  • 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “different or 5 additional contractual arrangements for arbitration can supersede 6 the rights conferred on the customer by virtue of the broker’s 7 membership in a self‐regulating organization”
  • customers are intended beneficiaries of member’s agreement to arbitrate pursuant to NASD, predecessor to FINRA, rules
  • customers are intended beneficiaries of member’s agreement to arbitrate pursuant to NASD, predecessor to FINRA, rules
  • customer \entitled to invoke [Rule 10301] as an intended third-party beneficiary\
  • “Paragraph 3 of the Customer’s Agreement ... incorpórateles] the NASD Code by reference. It is well established that an agreement to arbitrate may be incorporated by reference into a second contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff, Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.