Fairchild v. Trammell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that § 2254(d) requires us to give such state-court decisions \the benefit of the doubt\ (quoting Pinholster , 563 U.S. at 181, 131 S.Ct. 1388 )
• stating “Supreme Court holdings ‘must be construed narrowly and consist only of something akin to on-point holdings’” (quoting House, 527 F.3d at 1015)
• stating “Supreme Court holdings ‘must be construed narrowly and consist only of something akin to on-point holdings’” (quoting House, 527 F.3d at 1015)
• stating \Supreme Court holdings 'must be construed narrowly and consist only of something akin to on-point holdings.'\ (quoting House, 527 F.3d at 1015)
• stating “Supreme Court holdings ‘must be construed narrowly and consist only of something akin to on-point holdings’” (quoting House, 527 F.3d at 1015)
• declining to apply Trevino to Oklahoma’s procedural framework, which allows ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claims to be fully developed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).