Fairchild Space Co. v. Baroffio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no special mission if the only special element is that the employee was required to come in earlier than usual
• “Because there is no evidence that [employer] required [employee] to perform the work at home, the ‘dual purpose’ exception to the ‘coming and going’ rule is inapplicable.” (emphasis added)
• employee who chose to prepare a presentation at home and was injured the next morning in a car accident while going to her place of work could not rely on the work done at home to recover under the dual-purpose exception
• employee who chose to prepare a presentation at home and was injured the next morning in a car accident while going to her place of work could not rely on the work done at home to recover under the dual-purpose exception
• turning to Larson’s rendition of the dual-purpose exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).