Skip to main content
· 7/29/2011

Fairchild Liquidating Trust v. New York (In Re Fairchild Corp.)

Citations

  • 452 B.R. 525
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2822
  • 2011 WL 3267764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the plan’s “broad general retention of jurisdiction provision” insufficient to confer “related to” jurisdiction where it did not reference the specific claims or properties at issue
  • concluding “a breach of contract claim based on pre-petition conduct filed post-confirmation belongs to the reorganized debtor, without regard to when and how the claim arose.” (footnotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christopher S. Sontchi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.