· 7/29/2011
Fairchild Liquidating Trust v. New York (In Re Fairchild Corp.)
Citations
- 452 B.R. 525
- 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 2822
- 2011 WL 3267764
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the plan’s “broad general retention of jurisdiction provision” insufficient to confer “related to” jurisdiction where it did not reference the specific claims or properties at issue
- concluding “a breach of contract claim based on pre-petition conduct filed post-confirmation belongs to the reorganized debtor, without regard to when and how the claim arose.” (footnotes omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Christopher S. Sontchi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.