· 7/1/1881
Fairbank v. Hughson
Citations
- 58 Cal. 314
- 1881 Cal. LEXIS 214
Syllabus
<p>Expert—Evidence.—Whether one offered as an expert is qualified to speak as such is a fact preliminary to his testifying to be determined by the Court at the trial, and it is error to refer it to the jury.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing Royal v. State, 155 Ga. App. 691 (272 SE2d 556) (1980)
- reversing Royal v. State, 155 Ga. App. 691 (272 SE2d 556) (1980)
- “[w]here a defendant raises an affirmative defense and testifies to the same, the burden is on the State to disprove the defense beyond a reasonable doubt”
- defendant’s Brady motion sought disclosure of informant’s identity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.