Fair Laboratory Practices Assocs. v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Second Circuit in Mergent Services was “reviewing a district court’s order dismissing a qui tam action on the ground that a non-lawyer cannot bring a qui tam action pro se” (citing Mergent Servs., 540 F.3d at 93)
• affirming dismissal of qui tam action based on a violation of New York Rule of Professional Conduct 1.9(c
• “[T]he District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss 10 [a qui tam action brought by defendants’ former general counsel], presumably pursuant to the ‘inherent power . . . necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs.’ ” (omission in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).