Fair Housing Council of Orange County, Inc. v. Ayres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[HUD] has reaffirmed that facially neutral numerical occupancy restrictions violate the Act if they have a discriminatory effect, irrespective of intent”
• “Even if defendant’s damage prevention rationale were supported by independent evidence, it does not show the occupancy restriction is the least restrictive means to achieve defendant’s purpose.”
• Plaintiffs’ Lodged Cases, Ex. 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).