Skip to main content

Faigel v. Fairfield University

Citations

  • 75 Conn. App. 37
  • 815 A.2d 140
  • 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s alleged oral promise that plaintiff “would receive ‘many credits’” for her prior engineering studies in Russia did not qualify as a “specific contractual promise” under Gupta
  • holding 8 alleged promise that plaintiff “would be allowed ‘many credits’ from her prior engineering studies 9 . . . is too imprecise to qualify for consideration as a ‘specific contractual promise’”
  • finding the oral promise to receive “many credits” for work done abroad too vague to qualify for the specific promise exception
  • “To limit judicial intrusion into educational decision making, the student must ... allege nonperformance of a special promise, a promise outside the purview of normal educational expectations”
  • University’s alleged promise to give plaintiff “many credits” was too vague to establish a breach of contract claim
  • “[T]he basic legal relation between a student and a private university or college is contractual in nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.