Connecticut Appellate Court· 2/11/2003
Faigel v. Fairfield University
Citations
- 75 Conn. App. 37
- 815 A.2d 140
- 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 58
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant’s alleged oral promise that plaintiff “would receive ‘many credits’” for her prior engineering studies in Russia did not qualify as a “specific contractual promise” under Gupta
- holding 8 alleged promise that plaintiff “would be allowed ‘many credits’ from her prior engineering studies 9 . . . is too imprecise to qualify for consideration as a ‘specific contractual promise’”
- finding the oral promise to receive “many credits” for work done abroad too vague to qualify for the specific promise exception
- “To limit judicial intrusion into educational decision making, the student must ... allege nonperformance of a special promise, a promise outside the purview of normal educational expectations”
- University’s alleged promise to give plaintiff “many credits” was too vague to establish a breach of contract claim
- “[T]he basic legal relation between a student and a private university or college is contractual in nature.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-04-13· cited 61×
- Burns v. Quinnipiac UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-04-06· cited 42×
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-09· cited 30×
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-05-24· cited 24×
- Little v. Yale UniversityConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-08· cited 17×
- Caffery v. StillmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-02· cited 14×
- Visconti v. Pepper Partners Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-07-01· cited 9×
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. VaszilConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-07· cited 8×
- Taricani v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-05-27· cited 6×
- Marut v. INDYMAC BANK, FSBConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-03· cited 5×
- Pouncey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-31· cited 3×
- Demchak v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-25· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-12-31· cited 256×
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-04-11· cited 223×
- Craine v. Trinity CollegeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-12· cited 118×
- Mytych v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-23· cited 47×
- B & D Associates Inc. v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-15· cited 24×
- Yancey v. Connecticut Life & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-03-05· cited 21×
- Vogel v. Maimonides Academy of Western Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-11· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.