Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 2/9/2001

Fahy v. Horn

Citations

  • 240 F.3d 239
  • 2001 WL 121145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[i]n non-capital cases, attorney error, miscalculation, inadequate research, or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the ‘extraordinary’ circumstances required for equitable tolling”
  • finding that “[iJn non-capital cases, attorney error, miscalculation, inadequate research, or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the ‘extraordinary’ circumstances required for equitable tolling.”
  • finding that “[i]n non-capital cases, attorney error, miscalculation, inadequate research, or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the ‘extraordinary’ circumstances required for equitable tolling.”
  • noting that mistakes do not generally rise to extraordinary circumstances
  • noting that mistakes do not generally rise to extraordinary circumstances
  • compiling cases and noting that “attorney error, miscalculation, inadequate research, or other mistakes have not been found to rise to the ‘extraordinary’ circumstances required for equitable tolling.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKee, Nygaard, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Fahy v. Horn

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.