Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/1/2023
Fahrer v. Fahrer
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4380
Syllabus
Civ.R. 60(B) cannot be used to alter the statutory requirements for the modification of a divorce decree. Wife did not establish a meritorious claim or defense nor did she establish she was entitled to relief from judgment under Div.R. 60(B)(1) or (3)
Judges: Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1988-03-23· cited 956×
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 822×
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-08· cited 312×
- Walsh v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-09-18· cited 19×
- Stevens v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-23· cited 8×
- Quesinberry v. QuesinberryOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-04· cited 5×
Other cases named Fahrer v. Fahrer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.