Skip to main content
· 3/3/1922

Fahey v. Adams

Citations

  • 78 Pa. Super. 209
  • 1922 Pa. Super. LEXIS 86

Syllabus

<p>Contracts — Written contracts — Extension of time- — Parol evidence — Allegata and probata.</p> <p>In an action of assumpsit on a written contract for the sale of grain, modification of terms as to time of performance, which the conduct and mutual dealings of the parties show to have been clearly understood, may he shown by parol evidence, and do not constitute, a variance between allegata and probata, where the modification is so closely linked with the written contract as to constitute part of the same transaction.</p>

Judges: Head, Henderson, Keller, Linn, Orlady, Porter, Took, Trexler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.