· 12/15/2005
Fagin v. Gilmartin
Citations
- 432 F.3d 276
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 27411
- 2005 WL 3436666
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the appellate panel remanding to the district court for resolution by summary judgment “d[id] not intrude on the [district c]ourt’s discretion as to the extent of discovery it needs to decide the issue”
- determining demand requirements by reference to incorporation law under the “internal affairs” doctrine
- confronting a similar situation in the context of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion
- “The fact that a director is also an officer, without more, is insufficient to establish the director’s interest or lack of independence.”
- “Under New Jersey's choice-of-law rules, the law of the state of incorporation governs internal corporate affairs.”
- “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) requires and (2) comply with our order directing the parties to file supplemental briefing (Love had previously filed both an opening brief and a reply brief
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alito, Ambro, Restani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.