Fagan v. United International Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not sufficiently allege the existence of a disability despite undergoing multiple surgeries
• holding on summary judgment that plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning of the ADA because, despite surgery, Plaintiff failed to show that he was substantially limited in a major life activity
• finding relevant the fact that a doctor’s note given to plaintiff's employer upon his return to work put no restrictions on his work activities
• postoperative recovery following multiple knee surgeries fails to establish requisite long-term- impact to qualify as a substantially limiting disability
• “Even if the court accepts [the plaintiff’s] version of the facts, he cannot show (as required to prove his prima facie case) that he had more than a temporary inability to work after his surgeries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).