Fagan v. Deutsche Bundesbank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(4) where summons failed to name defendant
• finding Germany an adequate forum despite its less liberal discovery process
• “[The plaintiff’s] bald assertion of inability to pay is insufficient to defeat the forum non conveniens motion.”
• although pain and suffering awards are lower, Germany provides adequate forum for negligence claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DiFillippo v. Special Metals Corp.
  N.D. New York· 2014-03-26· cited 26×
• Hilaturas Miel, SL v. Republic of Iraq
  S.D. New York· 2008-08-20· cited 21×
• Gita Sports Ltd. v. SG Sensortechnik GmbH & Co. KG
  W.D. North Carolina· 2008-06-20· cited 16×
• GoldenTree Asset Management LP v. BNP Paribas S.A.
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-08-20· cited 6×
• Chirag v. MT Marida Marguerite Schiffahrts
  D. Connecticut· 2013-11-15· cited 3×
• Motors Liquidation Co. ex rel. Wilmington Trust Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)
  S.D. New York· 2016-12-07· cited 1×