Fafel v. DiPaola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that enforcement jurisdiction “extends only as far as required to effectuate a judgment”
• explaining that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) codifies the “common nucleus of operative fact” test adopted in United Mine Workers v . Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 (1966) (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “district court justifiably concluded that it had ancillary jurisdiction to enforce its Rule 68 judgment”
• a Rule 68 agreement is generally self-executing and the court's entty of judgment necessarily incorporates the terms of the defendant's underlying offer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).