Faeges v. Fendrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a petitioner in a nunc pro tunc appeal must proceed with reasonable diligence once he knows of necessity to take action
• “The time for appeal of a license suspension is established by statute and, therefore, [the licensee] must be charged with knowledge of that information.”
• appellant’s “single, and legally inadequate” assertion that he did not receive agency notice does not authorize nunc pro tunc relief
• “[a] court may permit a licensee to appeal nunc pro tunc [when] the licensee’s failure to file a timely appeal resulted from extraordinary circumstances involving fraud or a breakdown in the administrative or judicial process.”
• “[The licensee] . . . waited a month or two after he 12 received the restoration requirements letter[] . . . before he contacted an attorney. This delay shows a lack of reasonable diligence[] . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).