Skip to main content
· 7/29/2008

Fabriko Acquisition Corporation v. Prokos

Citations

  • 536 F.3d 605
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16074
  • 2008 WL 2894376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it is not the Court’s job to develop arguments for a party
  • upholding district court decision under predecessor E.D. of Wis. Civil Local Rule 56.2(b) to limit factual record when litigant failed to specify citations to evidentiary materi- als
  • upholding district court decision under predecessor E.D. of Wis. Civil Local Rule 56.2(b) to limit factual record when litigant failed to specify citations to evidentiary materi- als
  • upholding district court decision under predecessor E.D. of Wis. Civil Local Rule 56.2(b) to limit factual record when litigant failed to specify citations to evidentiary materi- als
  • affirming Rule 11 sanctions where a lawyer “continued to advocate a claim that had no legal basis and refused to alter or withdraw it when that deficiency was pointed out”
  • plaintiff “failed to respond to the defendants' proposed finding of facts as required under Civil Local Rule 56.2(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Flaum, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.