Fabre v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “there was evidence [to] conclude that [the parties] had actual notice of the order’s terms by virtue of their long-standing relation to the underlying controversy”
• “In ‘our system of representative litigation ... each party is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyer-agent ____’ ”
• “Those not 5 identified with a party, but in active concert or participation with him, are bound only with actual 6 notice.”
• non-party union members were bound by an order served on the union’s attorney and were held in criminal contempt for violating it because they knew the order had issued and may have had actual notice of its terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).