Skip to main content
· 2/28/2007

Fabel v. Masterson

Citations

  • 951 So. 2d 934
  • 2007 WL 601565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a lis pendens does not result in anticipatory breach because the contract offered the seller time to cure and the buyer “specific remedies” if the seller could not deliver marketable title
  • “It is axiomatic that the anticipatory breach of a contract by one party excuses contractual compliance by the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.