Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

F.A. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.

Citations

  • 640 N.E.2d 1313
  • 266 Ill. App. 3d 977
  • 203 Ill. Dec. 940
  • 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 1305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a circuit court is vested with jurisdiction to consider a claim for fees filed pursuant to a breach of contract when the complaint seeking fees as an element of damages is filed
  • discussing how a Rule 304(a) finding on one claim does not divest the court of jurisdiction over the remaining claims
  • contract term providing for the payment of attorney fees and costs incurred in enforcing any rights thereunder included right to supplemental fees and costs incurred after judgment was entered
  • \A request for attorneys' fees is a claim within the meaning of Supreme Court Rule 304(a)\ which governs the finality of judgments
  • “A request for attorney fees is a claim within the meaning of Supreme Court Rule 304(a)” which governs the finality of judgments
  • contract term providing for the payment of attorneys' fees and costs incurred in enforcing any rights thereunder included right to supplemental fees and costs incurred after judgment was entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.