Fa Li Liu v. Board of Immigration Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding retail merchandise of the Army and Air Force Exchange Service was not “military property of the United States”
• “In other words, it is either the uniquely military nature of the property itself, or the function to which it is put, that determines whether it is ‘military property’ within the meaning of Article 108.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).