F & M Marquette National Bank v. Emmer Bros. (In Re Emmer Bros.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that creditors’ complaint was “not an attempt to revoke or otherwise collaterally attack the confirmation order that is subject to the limitations period of Section 1144”
• noting that the Section 1144 time limit cannot be enlarged, and later noting that if an action for fraud is construed as an attempt to revoke the confirmation order, then it is barred by the limitations period in Section 1144
• the courts have held that creditors may not attack confirmation orders by simply characterizing the attempt as an independent cause of action rather than a motion to revoke the order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).