Skip to main content
· 8/1/2001

F & H INVESTMENTS INC. v. State

Citations

  • 55 S.W.3d 663
  • 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 5263
  • 2001 WL 872445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing facts under Rule 193.6, for failure to respond or supplement a discovery response, and not under Rule 215 for sanctions of discovery abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.