F. E. Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming for the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, see 115 F. Supp. 312 (E.D. Pa. 1953), which held that a movie theater lessor was too remote from antitrust harm directed at movie distributors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).