F. B. Hauck Cloth Co. v. Brothers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Rule 59(e), SCRCP motions are necessary to preserve issues not ruled upon for review when the circuit court sits in an appellate capacity
• finding it is incumbent upon appellant to show it had clearly raised the issue to the ALC and asked for a specific ruling in that regard to preserve the issue for appellate review
• stating a contemporaneous objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review
• stating “a matter may not be raised for the first time on appeal”
• noting our limited scope of review from a decision of the ALC does not allow us to make our own factual findings and remand may be appropriate when the ALC’s order is insufficient for appellate review
• finding an equal protection issue not preserved for review by the circuit court sitting in an appellate capacity because the appellant had not shown the issue was raised to and ruled upon by the administrative law court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).