Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is a “longstanding principle” that the internal affairs doctrine applies to derivative actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haussmann v. Baumann
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-06-22· cited 1×
• Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd
  New York Court of Appeals· 2025-05-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lerner v. Prince
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-05-22· cited 115×
• Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. American Centennial Insurance
  New York Court of Appeals· 1996-11-14· cited 84×
• Hart v. General Motors Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-06-25· cited 71×
• Greenspun v. Lindley
  New York Court of Appeals· 1975-05-05· cited 32×
• Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-03-10· cited 15×

Other cases named Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd
  New York Court of Appeals· 2025-05-20