Ezra Charitable Trust v. Tyco International, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing motion “to take judicial notice of the SEC’s 2006 complaint against Tyco” filed in district court, “the subsequent consent decree, and the final judgment”
• taking judicial notice of facts in an SEC filing to evaluate a motion to dismiss for lack of scienter under the PSLRA
• “Pleading ‘fraud by hindsight,’ essentially making general allegations that defendants knew earlier what later turned out badly, is not sufficient.”
• taking “judicial notice of the SEC’s 2006 complaint against Tyco” filed in district court, “the subsequent consent decree, and the final judgment”
• “If the evidence can support either affirming or reversing 7 the ALJ’s conclusion, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ.”
• “If the evidence can support either affirming or reversing 6 the ALJ’s conclusion, we may not substitute our judgment for that of the ALJ.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).